What are your thoughts on Dr. Gho’s partial extraction stuff? There’s a new study in the Journal of Dermatological Treatment:
Link: Donor hair follicle preservation by partial follicular unit extraction.

We are aware of this and I believe I’ve commented on partial unit extraction before. Similar work has been done by others with very different results, so I am a little skeptical. First of all, only five individuals were used in the study and between 100-150 grafts were harvested. The results look very promising, but I do not understand how you can achieve a success rate over 100% (104.1%) like is mentioned in the results.
It is also difficult to understand how one could keep track of where the 100 to 150 grafts were harvested from to see if they regrew hair. Think about this. Unless you make a clear mark (like a circular tattoo) around where you harvested the grafts, how can you say the hairs grew back? In the end, with all due respect to Dr Gho, I remain a bit of a skeptic.




Unfortunately, there’s no medication that can restore a hairline and surgery might be the only option. Hair transplants for the frontal hairline work well, even in African Americans. Unfortunately, many African American women I’ve seen with traction alopecia have lost much of their frontal hair, even the hair that goes into the temple peaks on the side, creating a concave look similar to a Norwood Class 4A pattern (see image at right). The problem is that the larger the area, the more hair it takes to get a thick result.
I believe there is confusion with respect to the NHI surgical fees. That pricing applies to traditional strip surgeries performed by us in our Los Angeles office. The standard fee is $6 per graft up to 2500 grafts. Anything beyond 2500 grafts would be charged at $2.50 starting with the 2501st graft. So graft #1-2500 are one price, #2501+ are lower. Like a taxi ride, the meter starts all over again on the next trip.