Author: Dr. William Rassman

Note: The annual meeting of hair surgeons was in held in Alaska this past week. The following review is very selective and is biased by the things that were interesting to me and what I (Dr. Rassman) thought could be interesting to the readers.

This is part 7. More to come…

***

 
Robot assisted hair transplantation was introduced for sale at the meeting.

It had been approved by the FDA earlier this year. There was considerable excitement generated by doctors, however, the high price tag ($200,000 plus $1/graft) certainly dampened the enthusiasm. This meeting was a come out party for Restoration Robotics’ hair restoration robot, a very impressive modern technology. The company believes that hair transplants will follow other minimally invasive and more precise surgeries such at the robot assisted surgery for the prostate, the heart, the uterus, the lung, and on and on. The hair transplant robot is called Artas® system, and will clearly standardize the quality of FUE grafts and minimize the damage when used by surgeons who are not as skilled in the manual techniques as some of the more experienced surgeons; however, all three of the first surgeons to buy the robot are experienced in the field of FUE. Restoration Robotics wants only the best surgeons to purchase and use the system.

One experienced hair surgeon, Dr. James Harris, has been testing the robot for some time for the company. Dr. Harris invented and marketed the most popular FUE harvesting tool (The SAFE System), which has been installed in over 200 hair transplant practices around the world. Although the two technique are comparable, Dr. Harris felt that the robot will minimize the tedium of doing the procedure for the doctor. I totally agree with him and I firmly believe that the new technologies like the robot will become the way of the future as FUE gains market share. The only question yet to be answered is “Who will pay for the higher costs of this procedure?“. As many of today’s hair transplant surgeons do not offer FUE, this opens the appeal for doctors to buy into the FUE technology to expand their service offerings. The unit is expensive, but should pay for itself easily in 4-7 years.

The Artas® system will generate more interest in FUE and many newcomers in the field will start to offer manual FUE at discounted prices to kick-start their business. All FUE techniques and surgeons are not equal and new doctors without extensive experience are bound to create significant transection of FUE harvested grafts causing more than their fair share of hair transplant failures. Unfortunately, the average prospective patient who does not do their research may fall trap into the pricing competition. The results will be (1) high transection rates with graft kill, (2) failure or the hair transplant to grow in significant quantities, and (3) large scale destruction of the donor area hair (something that is never reversible). This, as I have said before, is a buyer beware business for the potential FUE candidates looking for a bargain.

Hello Dr.
I am 21 years old and i have been using Rogain and Propecia for a long time( about a year). Unfortunately I have not had a positive result from these medicines. I lost hair since I was 15. I am norwood 1 or 2. I have heard about an oil called Rejuvenating Oil including oils from plants such as:

Olea Europaea (Olive) Fruit Oil, Sesamum Indicum (Sesame) Seed Oil, Arachis Hypogaea (Peanut) Oil, Prunus Amygdalus Dulcis (Sweet Almond) Oil, Simmondsia Chinensis (Jojoba) Seed Oil, Juglans Regia (Walnut) Seed Oil, BHT, Cananga Odorata Flower Oil, Lavandula Angustifolia (Lavender) Oil, Gardenia Florida Oil, Geranium Maculatum Oil, and also chemicals such as: Chlorphenesin, Amyl Cinnamal, Benzyl Alcohol, Benzyl Benzoate, Benzyl Salicylate, Citral, Citronellol, Coumarin, Eugenol, Farnesol, Geraniol, Hydroxycitronellal, Isoeugenol, Limonene, Linalool

Are these oils really helpful ?

No, the oils probably do not help with your hair loss. Of course, you’re welcome to try the product out for yourself, but I don’t see anything in that list that will cause your hair to regrow.

My question to you is why did you use Rogaine (minoxidil) and Propecia (finasteride) when you classify yourself as a Norwood 1? Plus, I’m not sure what you’re looking for as far as results that have lead you to believe there was no positive result. Are you expecting complete regrowth, or do you know that just seeing the hair loss halt is also considered a positive benefit? As you can see, after reading your email I’m left with more questions than answers. There is something wrong with your logic, and unfortunately without an exam and better medical history, there isn’t much I can offer you.

Note: The annual meeting of hair surgeons was in held in Alaska this past week. The following review is very selective and is biased by the things that were interesting to me and what I (Dr. Rassman) thought could be interesting to the readers.

This is part 5. More to come…

***

 
Does finasteride (Propecia) impact the body’s inflammation response in hair loss?

Dr. Marty Sawaya produced evidence that there is a connection between genetic hair loss and inflammation of the hair follicle. She believes that DHT may have a direct impact on the inflammatory process. With this insight, other potential treatments for genetic hair loss and other hair and skin disease may evolve.

 
Are finasteride’s sexual side effects overstated?

Despite internet complaints to the contrary, there are no case reports of sexual dysfunction that remained after finasteride was stopped in those patients who reported sexual side effects. The medical literature shows that sexual dysfunction is present in 40+ percent of men over age 50, so it was difficult to assess the 2% occurrence of sexual side effects in a comparable population. Despite this, changes in warning labels have been mandated in the United Kingdom, Sweden and most recently the US.

One joke on the floor I overheard was that based upon the internet reports, the average 50 year old had a better than 40% risk of sexual side effects, but that reduced to only 2% for those reporting side effects from Propecia, making Propecia less risky for those side effects.

http://www.pressreleaserocket.net/the-aesthetic-surgery-journal-publishes-groundbreaking-study-on-nape-hair-for-fue-hair-transplantation/328237/

Taking neck hair, which is often finer than scalp hair, has problems with it. These problems include:

(1) more prominent scarring occurs in the neck and the neck area is very visible so such scars will be detectable as punctate scars

(2) neck hair is often not permanent hair as scalp hair is, so if one transplants the frontal hairline with these finer hairs, they may disappear with age.

This is a warning to those who see this press release. They must know the risks associated with a neck hair donor area.

Note: The annual meeting of hair surgeons was in held in Alaska this past week. The following review is very selective and is biased by the things that were interesting to me and what I (Dr. Rassman) thought could be interesting to the readers.

This is part 6. More to come…

***

 
Does finasteride induce mood and other psychiatric changes?

A case report and literature review showed a connection between finasteride and mood changes. In one case presented, a patient suffered from severe disabling mood changes on finasteride, which ceased within a week after stopping the medication. After a short time period he restarted finasteride, and the mood changes returned within a few days. Other cases were reviewed with similar problems. There is little doubt that in some patients, mood changes and other psychiatric problems appeared with the use of finasteride.

I believe that these case reports are the exception to what we commonly see and that finasteride is generally safe, but if a patient feels that they have changes in their personality or mood since the drug was started or if a family member sees changes in their mental state, they should meet with their doctor to discuss the appropriateness of their continued use of the drug.

I’m very seriously considering starting a course of propecia/proscar. But before I began I wanted to ask two questions.

1. It has been said that if you start propecia early the better chance you have of slowing down/halting hair loss, but that doesn’t tally with the propecia chart from studies which show that it generally peters out after 3 years. so surely you’d only save your hair for 3 years and then it would quickly regress, not making much difference how early you start because you only have 3 years of good hair.

2. I was wondering if you could recommend a good dermatologist/hair doctor in London, who I could have a consulation with before I begin taking proscar, do you know any who do miniturisation tests or some kind of form of monitoring on hair loss? There are a lot of snake oil merchants in London that are willfully telling you that you must get on medication and I just want to talk to who is honest and experienced.

I have many patients that have reversed their crown loss and held the reversal over 10 years. Everyone is different, but the official studies show that the expected maintenance should be about 5 years on average. That means that some men get better than 5 years and some worse results while on the drug. It depends upon how aggressive your genes are.

As to your second question about London-based doctors, Dr. Bessam Farjo is a contributor to this site. He and his wife are terrific doctors and worthy of a trip to their offices (in London and Manchester). They may be able to give you a referral if you call their office.