Could This Be Shock Loss Behind My FUE in the Hairline? – Hair Loss Information by Dr. William Rassman

Dear Dr. Rassman,

First I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for this great website.

I have two questions and i would be very greatful if you can answer them :

1. I had an FUE procedure done on the front area (frontal hair line)with approx. 1200 grafts before three months ago, the strange thing that i am experiancing is some hair loss in the area behind, which is in the mid-scalp area, is this shock loss? shedding period? or the normal genetic hair loss pattern? and how can i tell the difference between them?

2. If your answer to question no.1 is shock loss then can you tell me what is the solution for it? and is there any chance of hair regrowth for those that were lost? (By the way i have used propecia for 12 months before a few years ago but with no success and i experianced terrible testical pain)

Thank you and Best Regards.

If you were not on finasteride when you had your FUE procedure, it would almost be certain that you had shock loss. You should have worked this through with your doctor prior to having the surgery. I always assess the status of the hair behind the transplant recipient site and if it showed significant miniaturization, one could have predicted this outcome. I would need to see you and understand what the loss area shows now.

I would also have considered lower doses of finasteride, which may have allowed you to use the drug without the complication. One quarter of a pill finasteride (0.25mg) can be effective at minimizing hair loss from shock.


Balding Forum - Hair Loss Discussion

Paid advertisements (not an endorsement):


FUE2 vs FIT – Hair Loss Information – Balding Blog

I’m 32 years old with near norwood 4 loss and am still confused over both these techniques. There were two previous posts that you replied stating that both procedures are identical but according to Dr. Coles website he claims that FIT is much better than FUE.

My personal search has led me to either pursue your new FUE² or Dr. Coles but I’m at a standstill and not sure which path would be better. IF both procedures are the same then the only criteria left for me in my decision would be $ cost per graft. My last question would be how much you charge per graft for a shaved head for a FUE² procedure? Thank you!

Block Quote

Follicular unit extraction (FUE) is the core terminology that I used to define the surgery when it was first published and is the recognized term worldwide. Could there be marketing hype used here? I would think so (my opinion). The tools have been overblown and unless the technique is substantially different, an FIT is an FUE. The FUE² is different from the FUE in the basic technique deployed, because it uses a dissecting technique with high pressure fluid to assist in the extraction.

Our fees for FUE are as follows:

  • $10/graft for procedures done by Dr. Pak
  • $15/graft for those done by me (Dr. Rassman)

Some doctors charge more if the head hair is not allowed to be clipped close (shaved), though our fees are the same. At the moment though, by not allowing us to clip the hair, the total number of grafts available will be less.

I Want More Density — Should I Get FUE or FUT? – Hair Loss Information by Dr. William Rassman

FUE VS FUT…

I am 28 year old male, i am planning for hair plantation never had it before and very confused to what method should i pick…strip or fue…i want denser and more hairs ofcourse..my donor area is pretty dense and good..

Please suggest

Either technique (FUT or FUE) can produce the density you may need. The choice of harvesting should include:

  1. The doctor and his/her skills
  2. The quantity of grafts needed
  3. The costs (usually FUE is more expensive that FUT)

Either technique can produce great densities and hundreds of these can be seen on our website here.

Balding Forum - Hair Loss Discussion

Paid advertisements (not an endorsement):


Shock Loss 6 Months After FUE Procedure? – Hair Loss Information by Dr. William Rassman

Its been 6 months since my HT Follicular Extraction surgery, and I notice that i have been shedding hair for the last month. The hairs that have been falling out have been robust and as thick as my donor hair. Initially after my HT, I never remembered any of my transplanted hairs falling out. Is it possible i never had an initial shed?

As I usually map out the scalp hair for miniaturization in advance of a hair transplant, I know quite a bit about what is happening when someone like you has this type of problem. Shock loss can occur as long as 6 months after a surgery, but I agree with you that it should not impact normal, non-miniaturized terminal hairs.


Balding Forum - Hair Loss Discussion

Paid advertisements (not an endorsement):


Could FUE Make My Linear Non-Transplant Scar Worse? – Hair Loss Information by Dr. William Rassman

I have a small, linear non-transplant scar above my ear. It has healed pretty well, and is looking more and more like normal skin each day. I’ve been thinking about transplanting hair into the scar by an east-coast doctor, about 100 grafts is my guess. If this were to be done with FUE, is there a huge risk that the scars produced from such a small FUE procedure will be worse than my linear scar? I want to be able to wear a buzz cut (somewhere around #2) as I believer my hair is thinning and short hair is a better look. Should I be very worried about moving just 100 grafts from the back of my head into this scar to minimize it?

Follicular unit extraction (FUE) is a good way to fill in a scar, but not all FUE is the same. Different doctors use different techniques and instruments. As long as the FUE instrument is less than 1mm (ideally 0.8 of 0.9mm diameter), you should be OK.

I am flattered you would ask me, but I would ask this question to your doctor since you need to trust the surgeon that will be performing the procedure on you!

Balding Forum - Hair Loss Discussion

Paid advertisements (not an endorsement):


Hair Transplants for Really Short Hair Style? – Hair Loss Information – Balding Blog

Hello Dr.

I have a short but interesting question for you.

Is there a way to get a hair transplant which caters to a shaved head? what I mean is, since it’s less important to have such a packed in and natural look when you shave your head; is it easier or cheaper to get some sort of thinner coverage on your head which still looks natural when you shave it really short?

Block Quote

I really don’t know what your expectations are, but I think that the answer is a hair transplant will not add value to your bald areas in the front, top, or crown in very low densities and wide distributions. If you want the easiest and cheapest way to have a shaved head look, use a razor and just take off whatever hair you have left.

Otherwise, the follicular unit extraction (FUE) technique doesn’t leave any linear scar in the back of the head, but there are tiny pinhole size scars that could be visible upon close examination. I’m not sure how short “really short” is for hairstyles.

I’ve Been on Propecia for a Year and I Got Shock Loss After a Small FUE Procedure – Balding Blog

Dr. Rassman,

I have used the search function and read all about telogen effluvium and shock loss post-transplant. I just had a very minor FUE procedure of 400 grafts performed a few days ago.

I have been on Propecia (1 mg) for over a year and have diffuse alopecia. However, I am now experiencing hair loss all over my head (including what I believe to be the donor area). Is this telogen effluvium from the shock of surgery or just ordinary shock loss? The doctor said it was probably just some shock loss. What the are long-term effects of something like this?

I notice the hair loss by doing a gentle (very gentle) pull test in all areas. Thanks for your help.

I honestly do not know. I am not trying to brush you off, but every case and every patient is different. What is your age? What did your hair look like under miniaturization mapping prior to your follicular unit extraction (FUE) procedure? Did you have diffuse unpatterned alopecia (DUPA)? If you had done a proper pull test, you might have developed a telogen effluvium (TE). Differentiating TE and shock loss may be difficult at this time. If you had DUPA, you could be at the forefront of disaster. If it is TE, then the hair may return, but if you are under 30 years old, I would want to know, because shock loss is often permanent in the very young men. For shock loss, it does not matter if you had a small surgery or a big surgery, as just the anesthesia can precipitate the process (even without the surgery).

This question points out a series of problems for me when trying to answer some questions here. I sometimes get minimal information and am asked about diagnosis and prognosis. What I do when I see a patient is get a complete medical history, including significant discussions on the hair loss history. Then I perform a very thorough examination, which includes mapping the scalp for miniaturization. I put it all together at that point. As you can see from the above email I received, when little information is available to me it is difficult to really help.

Consider a visit to my office for an appointment and then maybe I can help you more extensively. The cost of a trip to Los Angeles has to be minimal when compared to a large amount of hair loss, which is priceless. Or please speak with your doctor regarding this matter. In your case only time will tell and following it with your doctor may give you some comfort in what is happening to you.




Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Balding Forum - Hair Loss Discussion

NeoGraft FUE Tool – Hair Loss Information by Dr. William Rassman

Dr. Rassman,
I wanted to know what you thought of the NeoGraft system. The “FDA-approved NeoGraft automates the surgical removal of individual hair follicles, one at a time”. Do you think this will be just another flash in the pan invention or could it help assist hair transplant surgeons in the future?

Here is the link to the story: New NeoGraft Device Improves Hair Transplants

Regards

The story is actually a press release, which explains why it enthusiastically approves of the tool. One thing I’m disappointed with right off the bat is that it claims “no visible scars” occur if this tool is used, and that is simply untrue. Any puncture made to the scalp will result in a scar to some degree. I know what they were going for, but saying “barely visible scars” or “no linear scar” would’ve been more truthful.

I watched the video and it appears that the doctor is using a drill to remove the grafts from the donor area. It still seems tedious and I could not inspect the follicular units for transection rate analysis (damage done to grafts), which I would need to do to make a judgment on this FUE instrument/technique.

Balding Forum - Hair Loss Discussion

Paid advertisements (not an endorsement):


Could FUE2 Replace the Strip Method? (Part 2) – Hair Loss Information by Dr. William Rassman

This is Part 2 of 2. If you missed Part 1 from yesterday, that can be found here.

What is FUE2?

Ever since we announced the FUE2 technique a few months back, people have asked me how it is different from the traditional FUE procedure I invented and published in the medical journals back in 2002. The basic difference is the addition of a water jet for enhancing the dissection of the excised graft. The pressure of the water jet adds to creating a plane of dissection which produces clean grafts as good in most situations as strip harvested grafts (the golden standard for follicular unit transplants).

What is better, the strip or the FUE2? First lets assume that the FUE2 produces comparable quality grafts to the strip harvesting method. When the donor density is low, the missing follicular units from FUE2 become obvious when the hair is cut short. There can be a moth eaten look in these low density people. In high density people, the FUE does not show up so there is generally not a moth eaten appearance, but the many white dots created by the FUE scar can be seen and this will absolutely limit a shaved head. When a strip is performed and a good wide lower trichophytic closure is created, the scar is less in most patients than any scar from FUE. The problem is that most FUE doctors have created illusions around what they do and produce hype that will never be substantiated in most patients, particularly those with low to average densities and a high number of FUE grafts. I always tell the patient that I get 50% more $$$ for an FUE procedure (graft for graft), so if I recommend the strip as a viable alternative, it is clearly not a financial issue for me. The results of the evolution in my thinking is based upon following many patients (mine and other doctor’s patients) with regard to scarring.

THE FUE2 is a better procedure than the standard FUE, but not better with regard to strip harvesting in quantity and quality. FUE fails to grow at the 90% plus rate much of the time in most doctor’s hands, but strip grafts do not. I am afraid to tell you that honest doctors who do FUE are few and far between, but they do exist. With our FUE2 procedure, we clearly can do it better than most doctors. And as our survival rate following FUE2 is comparable to strip harvesting and significantly better than traditional FUE, the choice with us is clearly in the hands of the patient. I try to present a balanced approach in the analysis when patients come to my office and ask about FUE.

Balding Forum - Hair Loss Discussion

Paid advertisements (not an endorsement):