Crescina Hair Regrowth Formula

hello Dr Rassman,

i had a hair transplant surgery from a well recognized doctor before 7 months, without noticing very significant results.Maybe a very small change.i have been using that Crescina products for a few months for better penetration of the scalp.(the old skin fell over my scalp 2-3 months ago, after the surgery), and nowadays the skin of my scalp is clean. How long will it take for me to see good results, or shall i worry?please let me know, because i am a bit stressed.

Best Regards

It generally takes 7-8 months after a hair transplant to see enough hair length to show about 80% of the value. At about 12 months, 95% of the value of the hair transplants should be evident.

Regarding Crescina, while I am impressed by the slick product packaging and fancy animations on their site, none of the ingredients listed (including lysine, cysteine, silicon, zinc) blow me away. If its making your scalp feel cleaner and you’re not experiencing any irritation, you should continue doing as you please, but I wouldn’t look to this for hair regrowth.


2007-11-21 13:35:33Crescina Hair Regrowth Formula

Cutting Generic Finasteride

Dr. Rassman,

Good info is provided in this blog, I want to ask you a question regarding a previous posters comment on Generic Finasteride. Your response to the blogger was to purchase Generic Finasteride at Cosco or Wallgreens instead of ordering generic Finasteride online. How is this possible when Merck was granted an extended patent until 2013 (See Wikipedia on Finasteride)?

Also do you think its safe cutting the 5mg into 4ths which will be 1.25mg approx? Thanks!

Generic Propecia (1mg finasteride) isn’t legally available in the US due to the U.S. and International patents held by Merck, but generic Proscar (5mg finasteride) is available in the US and that’s what I was referring to. When cutting the 5mg pill, you’ll likely have some crumbs, so it might be a little less than 1.25mg. Regardless, I don’t think it’ll be a problem. If you can cut it into 5 equal pieces, that would be ideal… but not practical and the dose clearly does not have to be exact (as discussed elsewhere on today’s posts).

Platelet Infusion Stem Cell PRP In Hair Growth

Dr Joe Greco of Greco Med Group Florida claiming 80% success rate with infusing growth factors from ones own platelets into the scalp to regenerate hair. Really 80%? How can doctors make claims like this? Any safe treatment that had an 80% success rate would be duplicated all over the world wouldn’t it?

Anyone can claim anything. It may be true. I do not know. I cannot verify the claim personally. If these treatments do work, you are likely correct in stating that these treatments would be duplicated and offered all over the world – especially because it is such an easy and inexpensive thing to do. By that I mean, in essence, someone takes a vial of your blood and spins it down in a centrifuge to separate out the PRP (platelet rich plasma) from the red blood cells and injects it back to your body part (scalp).

I do know many doctors advertise Platelet Rich Plasma PRP therapy and discuss it in terms of regenerative therapy or stem cell therapy which definitely catches the attention of many consumers.

I also know that there are many articles and journals that publish positive results of these types of therapy but I have not found one that is truly a well designed research that has been replicated. What I mean by a well designed research, is called a Double Blind Randomized Control Study.

When reports come out that you get an 80% improvement, what does that mean? An improvement of what? If we get 90% of the hair to grow without it, does that mean that we can get 98% of the hair from a hair transplant to grow instead of 90% with it? There has never been a study done that shows value. We would have no objection to using PRP and may even do so one day, but as I believe that if a doctor needs to get an 80% improvement of their results by using PRP, then they have a problem in their technique and I would doubt that PRP would help them solve such a deficiency. I have seen doctors inject PRP into the scalp of balding men and women, but they do not do this as a charity, they charge for it, and charge they do. If we start injecting PRP which would be a push, we would not charge for it unless we demonstrated real value.

Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome

i have pcos, i have hair loss in the front of my skull, there are still some left but only a pathetic few. what should i do , i used to have this long black great hair. can i get it back.. thank you for your time.

Dr. Robert Bernstein (Hair Restoration Surgeon in New York) was kind enough to supply a thorough answer to this question for you…

Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS), originally called Stein-Leventhal disease, represents a number of conditions where ovulation is inhibited and, as a result, the ovaries become cystic and secrete more androgens than normal. The most significant of these androgens is testosterone, but other related androgens such as dihydroepiandosterone (DHEA) may be produced as well. Testosterone is converted to a hormone called dihydrotestosterone (DHT). If women have a genetic predisposition to balding, this hormone will cause the follicles on the scalp to shrink (miniaturize) and eventually disappear.

There are a number of treatments for hair loss related to PCOS. The first is the drug finasteride. Although not FDA approved for women, finasteride blocks the production of DHT (this is the same medication that has been approved for treating hair loss in men under the name Propecia) and thus will decrease or reverse the process of miniaturization. Weight loss (if this is appropriate) may also be helpful as this will decrease the body’s production of testosterone. Spironolactone, a diuretic, blocks testosterone and can also be useful. Finally, birth control pills, because they contain estrogen, will lower testosterone in the blood stream and thus decrease the amount of DHT produced. Please remember that these treatments should only be used under a doctor’s supervision.

Dense Packing Limits?

I am a 26 year old male, who has had two hair transplants in my frontal area. The density of hair in my transplanted regions is much lower than that of my natural hair, and hence looks a bit unsightly. I want to know if there is a limit to the number of FU grafts one can transplant in order to improve density. If so, what are the dangers of exceeding this limit?

The normal hair densities of non-transplanted hair are measured at 193 hairs per cm squared (97 follicular units per cm square). A transplant doctor can put in densities of half of that in a single session. If you have thinning hair, then your density is not up to a level adequate to appear full. There are no inherent dangers in dense packing the hair in a transplant surgery provided that the doctor’s team is able to do it.

Dense packing, a technique we defined in 1993, makes for less surgeries and more fullness. If the wounds are over a particular size (more than 1.7mm each) then the risks start impacting the patient, for example, with regard to blood supply. If the wounds are smaller than 1.7mm, then the risks of dense packing of the grafts all but go away. We use wound sizes of about 1mm (the size of the wounds vary with each patient). The smaller the wounds, the faster the healing. Healing in this context means that the wounds on the skin become almost impossible to see, something that usually takes a day or two on most of our patients. Wounds greater than 1.7 mm, tend to show for longer periods. Some transplant patients in the old days saw wounds measuring 3-4 mm each (the old plugs), and they were visible for weeks after the surgery.

Sexual side effects from finasteride real or nocebo?

One doctor told me this story as he believes that PFS is totally a nocebo effect. This is how he proved it to himself.

His brother was going to have a second hair transplant and believed that the finasteride caused him sexual side effects the first time he took it. So he refused to take the medication in preparation for a second surgery a few months down the road. His sister-in-law (the man’s wife) put two finasteride 1mg tablets into his daily shake which she prepared after he went to the gym without telling her husband.

So he took 2 mg per day for 3 months and told his surgeon brother that his hair miraculously was thicker and laughed that he didn’t have to take finasteride and experience side effects. At the three month mark, his surgeon brother told him that his wife had put double the dose of finasteride into his daily shake without telling him, in other words 2mg of finasteride per day. Not knowing that he was taking the finasteride, he had no side effects at all. So the idea that you can talk yourself into side effects was raised here. I know that there are sexual side effects with finasteride and I have seen that with my patients, so I am not suggesting anything to the contrary; however, there are some people who are just highly suggestive and worrying alone, can bring on side effects. No surprise.


2020-02-25 08:34:36Sexual side effects from finasteride real or nocebo?

Density in Different Parts of the Scalp In Non-Balding Men?

Dr. Rassman
First of all I just wanted to say what a great blog you guys have!

I’m a 29 year old male with a thick head of hair and have been to the dermatologist recently and he said I have no signs of male pattern baldness but maybe going into a mature hair. I did the wrinkle brow test, but honestly my hairline even in old pictures when I was little was never really near my highest crease. How can you measure a mature hairline other than wrinkle brow? Because like I said my hairline never was like that even when I was seven years old.

I also notice that on top of my head I get hairs that are short and look thinner if I pull them out and the rest of my hairs are thick and coarse but all over my hairs seem to have different degrees and the dermatologist told me this was totally normal but I just wanted to ask you if it is? The lady that cuts my hair since I was twelve thought I was crazy when I ask her this, because she told me that she also has hairs that are thinner and thicker all over the hair and everyone does do to different hair cycles and its nothing to worry about. I do have a little OCD so I might be obsessing about something that’s totally normal.

I know the hair bulk test that you guys do is good and I told this to the lady that cuts my hair and she said if I really wanted to buy the Haircheck device that she would do it for me if I was worried and to ease my mind. I saw the video of the guy getting it done on my computer from the HairCheck website. In the video I notice they measured his hair in the middle and wanted to know if you can measure it at the hairline instead? Would the density in the front of the hairline be a little different than the back (donor area) even for a person with no signs of balding (MPB)? Do you always have to measure in the center or can you measure the left and right side head? Is measuring in the center the only way to do this bulk measurement test more accurately? Is there also a normal amount for a non balding person that the hair in front can be a little different than the hair in the back (donor hair) like percentage wise which would be consider normal?

Thanks for your time and hope to hear back from you soon! Sorry so long also You can publish this if you like too.

Movement of the hairline to the mature position is common by your age. Measuring the mature hairline using the wrinkled brow is really more of a loose “rule”. I’ve written about that here.

Hair cycling is normal as your follicles go through different phases of growth (anagen, catagen, and telogen), so yes, your dermatologist was correct that it is normal to have some hairs with different degrees of thickness depending on where it is in the growth process. If you want to know if you are balding just behind the frontal hairline, the HairCheck is good to give a number to compare one part of the scalp to the next. You can measure at the hairline, but you should make measurements in multiple parts of the scalp.

Pot Smoking Mothers Have Children With Brain Problems

Prenatal exposure to pot is associated with differences in the thickness of the brain, particularly in the frontal brain, in preadolescent children. This was a study done with MRIS. This was written by Hanan El Marroun, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands and published online June 15 in Biological Psychiatry.

Children aged 6 to 8 years were invited into the MRI component of the program and the mothers use of cannabis exposure during pregnancy was measured with maternal self-report asking questions for each each trimester of the pregnancy. 113 nonexposed children; 96 children whose mothers smoked only tobacco during pregnancy; and 54 children whose mothers were studied during the pregnancy.

When comparing exposed to non-exposed children, those exposed to cannabis had “thicker frontal cortices, specifically, a thicker superior frontal area of the left hemisphere… and a thicker frontal pole of the right hemisphere” This part of the brain, the prefrontal cortex, supports functions such as the ability to suppress responses and thoughts, attention, higher-order motor control, and working memory.