Thank you for the baldingblog. The answers you’ve give over the years are a very valuable resource for patients before, during and after hair transplants.
It’s now 9 weeks after my FUE. My recipient area is very red and incision marks are all visible. The color and texture of the recipient area improved until the 2 week mark, but since then it hasn’t changed in the last 7 weeks. I understand from your baldingblog that your patients have at most 6 to 8 weeks of redness (you wrote about it in separate posts in March and May, 2014). Unfortunately, my redness has lasted longer than that and shows no signs of improving any time soon. For what it’s worth, I’ve seen internet posts by guys who have had similar redness, so I imagine this is a topic of interest for quite a few men.
I’ve had no sun exposure, swelling, pus, warmth, fever, or health issues. I did thorough blood both tests before the operation as well as last week; all results were and still are good. There’s no hair growth yet obviously, but at 9 weeks, that’s normal. My HT surgeon said it’s the reddest he’s ever seen. He has no idea what’s going on. He said it doesn’t seem infected or to have any problems except that it’s still very, very red with incision marks still visible to the naked eye. He very honestly told me that he doesn’t know what to advise and suggested speaking to other doctors. I’ve consulted several doctors, both hair surgeons and dermatologists. They all have very different ideas for diagnosis and treatment, as well as reasons why the other proposed treatments aren’t good. I’m confused by the different ideas and would like to ask your opinion about them:
Treatment #1.
Diagnosis: small dilated blood vessels near the surface of the skin (“broken capillaries”), i.e. a form of telangiectasias caused by the trauma of surgery. If you push with finger on the redness and release, the skin becomes white for a second and then returns to red. That brief whiteness happens because of these dilated blood vessels. Treatment: pulsed dye laser (“V-beam”). Targets only the red wavelength of the capillaries, so the laser will reduce the redness but not hurt the (soon-to-arrive) growth of the transplanted follicles.
Counter-argument: The range of wavelengths of the V-beam laser cannot be made so narrow as to ONLY work on the blood vessels. The laser will probably hurt the hair follicles and harm my eventual transplant result.
Treatment #2.
Diagnosis: inflammation caused by the HT surgery. Treatment: 100 little PRP injections throughout the red area as an anti-inflammatory to stimulate angiogenesis. In addition to promoting healing of the redness, it will help the eventual hair growth.
Counter-argument: PRP won’t help much, while 100 injections into an already red area would just irritate the skin more and cause even more redness.
Treatment #3.
Diagnosis: inflammation similar to eczema. Treatment: a mid-level topical corticosteroid with potency around 100-150x hyrocortisone, perhaps mixed with an anti-bacterium. It’s anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive, vasoconstrictive. Doesn’t affect the hair follicles. Try it 3-4 weeks. If it helps, great; if not, stop after a month and there’s no danger of harm or long-term damage.
Counter-argument: The vasco-constrictive properties of steroids is exactly what I don’t want while my body is trying to heal itself now. And steroids have lots of bad side affects: red skin syndrome from withdrawal, thinning of the skin, etc.
Treatment #4.
Diagnosis: That’s life. I’m blonde, light blue eyes, fair skin (stereotypical Scandinavian look). Redness can happen. Treatment: can’t do anything. Will take 6 months to 1 year to heal. Bad luck. Buy lots of hats.
Continue reading “Patient with persistent redness in the recipient area (with Photos)”