One Doses of Propecia & Chest/Breasts Discomfort After 17 Hours

So I started Proscar (1.25mg for AGA) in a hope to prevent/slow down any possible hair loss (25 years old male with NW2, only a receded hairline and I have mid-back length of thin curly hair).

After my very first dose, I (after like 17 hours) felt some discomfort in the breasts/chest/upper abdomen, is this even possible? I gave it a try for 4 days and it’s still persisting (it’s not a full blown pain but rather a discomfort), I stopped the drug out of fear of Gyno, was this a sign of Gyno? This is my 3rd day off-drug and the discomfort is still there, what should I do? I really should take Finasteride and I am planning to restart it at 0.5mg once the discomfort resolves, is this the correct action?

If you believe you are having negative side effects, why would you want to continue the medication? The correct action is speaking to you doctor about this.

Anything is possible but it seems improbable. Gynecomastia from Propecia use takes several week if not months of use.

Finally a Norwood 2 is not generally considered balding and Propecia only treats the vertex (crown) area of the scalp – (not the front corners). We routinely offer actual tests to determine if you have genetic pattern balding routinely on every patient coming in to see us who are like you. We don’t want people on drug that do not need them.

Chronic Thyroiditis and Hair Loss

Dear Dr William Rassman,

I’m a woman and I’m 30 years old. I’ve been losing my hair for 13 months, 150 hairs per day and a lot of them when I wash my hair. They have informed me that I have the telogen effluvium and a miniaturization of my hair. I have no problem with my health and hormones. Only a problem (Hashimoto thyroid), but the TSH is normal. What can I do for that? Can I expect that with the time, the hair loss will be stopped? Have I a risk to become bald? I have a lot of hairs, and 10 years ago I have had the same problem and the hair loss had been stopped 2 years later.

Thanks for your help.

The connection between Chronic thyroiditis (Hashimoto’s disease) and hair loss has been known for some time. Clearly, your thyroid needs to be under good management, then pulling back and looking at the hair loss under the guidance of a good dermatologist would probably be the best way to command what is going on with your hair. I doubt that you will go bald, and you probably will find that control of the hair loss will be like your last episode years earlier. Women almost never go bald, but they can push thinning at times. If it had reversed before, then you might safely assume that it will reverse to some degree again. The focus, as you so rightly concluded, is to stop/contain the hair loss. Like a chicken and an egg scenario, what came first? Chronic thyroiditis may have layered on top of the female balding genetics in your family line.

One year ago I had a failed hair transplant. Should the doctor do something about this failure?

?The law in most states forbid a surgeon from a guarantee for any surgery. Think about it, if you had cancer and your surgeon guaranteed that he would cure you, that is impossible and illegal. So a hair transplant is the same thing; however, any good doctor should warrant his work regardless of the fault. If there is some failure of any part of the hair transplant process, or any complication that should arise, I am always good to make it right. I want patient satisfaction 100% of the time

Class Action Law Suit Approved by the Quebec Government

Oral Antiandrogens for Female Hair Loss

Hi
I was wondering what your opinion is of this study? Thank you!

Treatment of Female Pattern Hair Loss with Oral Antiandrogens

I referenced this article before — Treatments Available for Female Hair Loss

The conclusion of the authors suggest that there is merit in the use of antiandrogens, but the study is not statistically significant. Since my earlier reference 2 and a half years ago, our ability to separate women into two classes (those who are sensitive or not sensitive to antiandrogens) through the use of new genetic tests holds great promise for the future management of women’s hair loss. It is possible that in those women who had the best response to antiandrogens are women who have a high sensitivity to the antiandrogens as determined by genetic test (see HairDX). The study should be repeated with the genetic groups separated.

When not to prescribe finasteride

I perform HAIRCHECK tests on most patients who want to start finasteride because I want to be able to follow their progress and if the drug is halting or reversing the hair loss., The HAIRCHECK test gives me a metric which allows me and the patient to know with reasonable certainty what is happening to them and with my experience I can often predict long-term hair loss patterns allowing my patients to build a Master Plan for future planning both for financial reasons and for hair growth reasons. If the HAIRCHECK shows no balding, I don’t prescribe finasteride. Also if a patient is depressed and I feel that there will be a link between finasteride and his depression, I might not prescribe it. My assessment of the patient is always one-on-one and then I have the priveledge to prescribe it or not.

In addition, I take a careful history, get to know the patient and try to understand their sexual history and if they may be good a candidate or not go good candidate for this drug. I have turned people down based upon these discussions.


2020-09-26 06:53:14When not to prescribe finasteride

Comment on Dr. Haber’s Article on finasteride

Thank you for posting my comment on your blog this week. I re-read my comment and thought it may have been unclear so I wanted to clarify a point.

Haber’s original data set showed some peculiar results for the finasteride (F) group versus the control (C). It is very widely accepted that finasteride impairs sexual functioning compared to the control but that was not what Haber found in his study due to the research design. I don’t really know how to put it any more nicely unfortunately. According to the ASEX score, (F) had only 24.3% with some sexual dysfunction versus 38.4% for (C). Libido was similar between groups with (F) showing 22.8% with libido loss and (C) at 22.2%. Reduced sexual functioning was much lower for (F) at 17.8% versus 24.2% for (C).

Keep in mind there is a small amount of missing data in the fin group but it shouldn’t matter that much. Because of the way they excluded patients who stopped taking the drug, likely due to side effects, the data appears to show that on average finasteride improves sexual functioning but that isn’t true because the data isn’t properly randomized. Everybody basically knows that finasteride causes sexual side effects and the data is growing ever stronger that a small group gets persistent side effects. When their data showed the opposite effect and they didn’t stop to question why, they decided to completely ignore the data and conclude “there was no difference in loss of libido, reduced sexual performance, or the number of men with an ASEX score indicating sexual dysfunction.” I’m really not sure how this article got published but the authors appeared to have willfully distorted the data and study design to meet their presumed conclusion.

https://baldingblog.com/reddit-reader-comments-on-a-baldingblog-post/

My experience parallels Dr. Haber’s experience as well as another few dozen doctors with lots of experience. From a first hand perspective, I take it and don’t have ED or libido issue and my son took it and got an increased sexual drive. My patient’s parallel the official reports with about 2-4% ED and libido issues, possibly slightly higher. I have written thousands of prescriptions for finasteride and that makes me more of an authority than those who look in from the sidelines.


2021-07-02 09:00:05Comment on Dr. Haber’s Article on finasteride