What Do the New RepliCel Results Mean in Layman’s Terms? – Hair Loss Information – Balding Blog

Dear Dr. Rassman,

Replicel results are in! But I couldn’t understand, given the presented statistical data, if there are any reasons to be excited. Not that I’m mathematically crippled or anything, but because I’m not sure what a 12.3% change in vellus hair density would mean to a consumer like me, who is concerned more with adjectives like “bleh, ok, good and awesome”.

Care to share your thoughts for us laymen? Link is:

RepliCel Releases Positive Results from the Interim Analysis of Data from its First-in-man TS001-2009 Clinical Trial

Thanks

Block Quote

In layman’s terms, I do not know exactly what 12.3% change in vellus hair really means either, but I think that it is safe to say that this is not an awesome result. I would like to know if there were noticeable cosmetic differences in appearance and knowing that the vellus hairs do not contribute much to the fullness of your hair, I would think that any impact would be best described as “ehhh”.

7 Replies to “What Do the New RepliCel Results Mean in Layman’s Terms? – Hair Loss Information – Balding Blog”

  1. Vellus hair is the fine, almost invisible hair. It doesn’t mean squat. If it were a 12.3 percent change in terminal hair growth, then I’d say they were on to something!

  2. I think this first trial was just to make sure it was safe. So presumably they were using fairly small doses over a small area, on a smallish number of people.
    So that means results on amount of hair growth are fairly irrelevant just now, especially because it’s only 6 months down the line (and we know this isn’t long enough to tell if anything else has been effective like propecia or a hair transplant).
    So in layman’s terms – it’s a not much to tell yet. See what they say in a couple of hours

  3. Or forget about Replicel and encourage Histogen to finish quicker.
    I’m glad the doc mentioned cosmetic results. This was a question the spin doctors at replicel always avoided. I guess because 12.5% more invisible hairs doesn’t really help.

  4. Len, in a safety trial, the point is to find out with confidence that the drug is safe, so you use a quite high dose. If a high dose is safe, one assumes that a lower dose will be safe as well.
    If the safety trial involved a low dose, you wouldn’t really be proving safety, and would be wasting years and millions of dollars.

  5. I know a doctor in sri lanka who is doing hair cloning right now. He has done 150 patients. They all had no hair now they have a full head of hair. He is taking the hair from a sasquach and multiplying it in a special medium made from bat wing oil. He’s charging $5000 per head and pretty soon you’re going to hear about him. His name is Dr. Kumaraguru Rishimukkamuladevamuhat. He is in village named Sigiriya.

Leave a Reply to Len Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *