Category: Uncategorized

Posted on

UNETHICAL Hair Transplant Surgery

HERE IS A LETTER I SENT TO A PATIENT: “You have had previous hair transplants done by Dr. XXX with 3400 grafts in the front of your head. You were very frightened about the prospect of being bald at that age of 23. Now you are 31 years old and started Propecia 4 months ago. You want to know the status of your balding situation.

Today’s we used the HAIRCHECK instrument on your head. Measurements indicated that you hair bulk in the frontal 3 inches of your scalp that exceeds the hair bulk of the donor area by 30%. Comparing the crown and the back of your head, the measurements were comparable.
This tells me two things:
  1. You are not presently balding
  2. Your hair transplant done years ago was done on a young man that probably was not balding but driven to have a hair transplant out of fear of balding. Frankly, you were taken advantage of for the money. I am ashamed that doctors in this field would take advantage of your youth and naivety.You agreed with me that in hindsight, you were driven by fear, not balding
The good news is that you should stop the Propecia and if you are ever concerned again about balding (which i believe will be unlikely for your future), please come back and let me retest you with the HAIRCHECK instrument.”
I wrote this to a patient and sent it off to be published because in the hair transplant community, this type of behavior is not unheard of, even today. Too many doctors practice this type of surgery, because for them, every patient has a ‘bucket’ of money that they can tap. Some of these doctors are predators, who think that it is easy to manipulate their patients, set them in a panic mode, so that they can push them to have a surgery, needed or not, often more than less. There is no such thing, in my opinion, as hair transplants that are done to prevent what hair loss might occur in the future by transplanting areas behind the balding pattern that needs transplants. So what doctors do far too often, is that if a person needs 1500 grafts, the doctor will recommend 3000 grafts (double the grafts and double the fee) and put these extra grafts into the normal, non-balding area. What makes it worse, these grafts into non-balding areas may kill normal hairs. Who could challenge these doctor, certainly not the patients who believe that doctors are not crooks but sort-of god like. Patients often don’t know any better, so they believe the doctor who tells them that they need 3000 grafts when in fact, only half of that is needed. Don’t get me wrong, when a patient needs 3000 or more grafts, I will do it. The overall warning here is LET THE BUYER BEWARE. Don’t trust your doctor if for any reason, you think that your doctor is not being honest with you. You can always get a second opinion and therefore protect yourself by shopping around. You will pay $$$, in the short term and valuable donor hair in the long term and unfortunately there is no going back, no recourse.
Posted on

Hair Transplant Density

what is the most you pack per cm2 when you do a transplant????? please let me know .. thanks

Density of the average person is about 200 hairs per square mm. A doctor can transplant as high as 10-50% of the original density. It is important to focus more in the issues of fullness. This is not a ‘weight lifting contest’, which is unfortunately what some doctors are pushing for. I could transplant as much as 50% of the original density, but the real issues are:

  1. Will it grow? There are many factors that will determine this: the health of the skin, the amount of atrophic changes in the skin caused by sun damage and the advanced level of balding, scarring that is present, etc. We generally expect that growth will approach 100% of what is transplanted, but that is only true when everything is right-on — and that rarely happens.
  2. What is needed? This is the most important question that must be asked. People with low hair to skin color contrast, good texture, good hair thickness, etc. do not generally require the greatest densities to achieve the look of fullness.

Hair transplantation is as much an art as it is a surgical process. The judgments of a good surgeon with years of experience will make the correct decisions that are in the best interests of the patient.

Posted on

Hair Transplant — Multiple Procedures or One Large Procedure?

Hello Dr. Rassman,

With regard to future donor density/yield, what is the better option:

Several small strip procedures or one very large procedure?

What I’m basically asking is which one would be more detrimental to your donor supply for future transplants (possibly affecting laxity)?

I have to speak in generalities, something that I do not like to do as every situation is different. Generally speaking, the less the number of surgeries the better for the donor supply, but as larger and larger sessions are tackled, the surgical team is as critical as other items such as donor density and laxity. Each surgery has a built in waste factor (I estimate it in a good doctor’s hands at about 4-5% in a strip surgery) so two surgeries will produce more waste (a relatively small amount of waste). In the hands of a surgical team not designed for very large sessions (over 2000-2500 grafts), the larger session might cause a longer surgical time, more time for the grafts to be out of the body, and more time for dessication (drying of grafts causing graft death). Longer surgeries require more anesthesia and a skill in managing the anesthetic requirements is critical for larger sessions. In the rush to keep pace among the field’s leaders, many groups try to offer larger sessions (3000-5000 follicular unit graft range) even though they are ill prepared for this service. Some groups dishonestly sell these larger sessions and do not deliver on them, yet do charge for them… causing a fraudulent transaction (more common than most doctors will admit to, i.e. “It’s the other doctor, not me!”).

You were right to ask about the future donor supply. Very large sessions may reduce your donor supply very significantly when they are done, so it is good to understand what the session will do to the Master Plan for the patient. Running out of donor supply could be a critical error if it is done in one session. Look at today’s 12:31pm post (2 down from this post) and look at the real donor supply. Any hair taken outside this rim of hair is not permanent so if the doctor goes too high or too low, you may find out in the long term that what you received is not permanent.

Posted on

Using Cover-Ups After Transplant

How soon after a transplant procedure can you resume using cover ups such as, Couvre or GLH, until your newly transplanted hair grows in?
Thank You!

The use of Couvre and other scalp coloring agents, which tend to be powdery, can be safely used after the scabbing is gone. Scabbing is gone as early as 1-2 days on the short side, and 5-9 days on the long side. The difference between the short and long side reflect two controllable variables and one non-controllable one. The controllable ones are (1) size of the wounds, the smaller the wounds the shorter the healing time, and (2) the washing technique used at the surgery, the end of the surgery and the next day or two after the surgery. Good aggressive washing gets rid of scabs (in many of our patients) in a day or two. We offer hair washes for all of our patients after the surgery and as often as they feel that they are helpful. Patients are rightfully afraid to be too aggressive with the wash, out of fear that the grafts will be washed out of their recipient site. The non-controllable variable is the patient’s individual and unique reaction to the surgery. Some patients tend to exude more ‘transudate’ from the wounds (the yellowish fluid that brings blood-coagulating elements will often form scabs) and some patients may have microscopic bleeding at the wound site after the surgery (forming clots). All of these scabs and clots can be washed off the next day with properly administered washing techniques.

After the scabs are gone, these powdery agents can be used until the new hair wipes out the need for them (usually 5-8 months after the surgery).

Posted on

Hair Transplant Results of Man with 2415 Grafts (with Photos)

This is a college professor who saw a new man in the mirror with this single hair transplant procedure of 2415 grafts. He has fine hair, which often takes more than one session for a completely full look. He told me that no one ever noticed the transition in his appearance, because the change was so slow.

Approximately 2/3rds of the transplants were placed in the first 6 inches of the hairline, which was moved forward, and some grafts were placed in the frontal part of the crown area.

Click photos to enlarge.

After (2415 grafts):

 

Before:

 


2011-10-23 16:35:18Hair Transplant Results of Man with 2415 Grafts (with Photos)

Posted on

Using Minoxidil on Bald Spot from Trichotillomania

Dear Dr. Rassman,

My question is: might minoxidil work for a bald spot caused be trichotillomania? Is this worth a go? If so, have you heard of the product ‘Kirkland Signature’ who are a cheaper alternative
to Regaine?

Many thanks.

Trichotillomania produces hair loss from traction, which can kill the hair follicles that are under constant attack. Once they die, I would think that the follicles can not be brought back to life, and as such, I would not expect that minoxidil will have a benefit in the areas where balding is produced from trichotillomania. I have heard of the Kirkland brand, which I believe is just a generic minoxidil.

Posted on

Hair Transplant Without Scars?

I read a doctor’s web-site and he said his hair transplants did not produce scars in the donor area. Is that possible?

The FUE technique is often called a “scar-less” surgery, but that is misleading. Instead of the linear scar with conventional strip harvesting, FUE produces punctate scarring (pin-point scars about 1mm or less in size). If a doctor would state either in an advertisement or on his/her website that they perform scar-less surgery, any doctor that did this in California, for example, would violate truth in advertising rules and could be disciplined for use of such language by the Medical Board of California. Every time the skin is cut, no matter how small the cut it, it will produce a scar. FUE scars can be seen easily when the scalp is shaved or clipped closely and doctors use many ‘punch’ sizes which will impact the size of these punctate scars.


2009-12-02 12:03:22Hair Transplant Without Scars?

Posted on

Using the LaserComb After a Hair Transplant

I used the Hairmax Lasercomb for 6 months or so. I expected major new growth but saw nothing to that extent. The only thing the product really did was make my remaining hair appear healthier. Overall i don’t know what to think of the Lasercomb. From what i’ve read it doesnt seem to target DHT or regrow the long lost hair lost due to DHT. “It is only to be believed to promote healthy anagen hair growth” (From hair follicles that have not been damages from DHT im guessing?). So wouldn’t the LaserComb be great for newly transplanted patients?

I’m two weeks post op. My grafts are securely anchored and the transplanted hairs are shedding, would it be safe for me to use the lasercomb and how effective would it be?

I don’t think that the LaserComb would produce any harm to transplanted hairs. I doubt it’ll be “great” for them, but if you’re happy with your hair health on non-transplanted hairs, by all means…


2009-04-30 14:27:14Using the LaserComb After a Hair Transplant

Posted on

Hair Washing and Hair Loss

I’m a 36 year old male with no visible hair loss…..yet. For around 6-8 months now I’ve been following a very lax hair washing routine. I had a girlfriend who had adopted the wash less routine in an attempt to achieve healthier looking locks. Apparently her stylist told her it was the latest trend. She used dry shampoo powder and only washed once a week. At the time I thought it seemed perfectly logical so I too adopted the routine. After we broke up I carried on with the same hair hygiene but with less dry shampoo washing and more and more infrequent regular washing. For the last 4 months I’ve been going on average between 7 and 12 days without a shampoo. It gets greasy and a little itchy but I often wear a hat so aesthetically it doesn’t look bad. Recently my new girlfriend noticed that my head “stank“. When I told her that I was on this infrequent washing trend she told me that it was a terrible idea and that it was proven that non-washing leads to hair loss. Of course I was freaked out and started doing some research on in. The internet is awash in conflicting information but it seems that some doctors believe that sebum build-up can have a negative impact on hair growth and that it can even plug follicles and cause permanent hair loss. On top of that, non-washing is known to cause bacteria growth, inflammation and irritation, which in turn leads to hair loss. Oh, and there’s the old “wearing a hat” thing as well. Now I’m confused and becoming convinced I’m either showing signs of thinning or have done damage to my hair that will manifest itself in hair loss later down the road. As of now my only signs of negative impact are a dry flaky scalp, plus some itching and irritation. Your professional opinion on this whole infrequent hair washing thing would be greatly appreciated. Thank-you.

stinky hair

You do not need a professional opinion.

If you want to keep your current girlfriend, consider maintaining clean hygiene and washing your “stinky” hair.

The frequency of hair washing has nothing to do with genetic male pattern balding.
Bacteria and fungal infection from poor hygiene can cause hair loss.